Showing posts with label Raj Thakeray. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Raj Thakeray. Show all posts

Saturday, 8 November 2008

Mumbai Cowboy


By Kumar Ketkar      Muslim India
first posted on Wed, Oct 22 02:56 AM

It is a win-win situation for Raj Thackeray. He must have desired to get arrested. That keeps him in the headlines and also steals the media limelight from his main rival, the Shiv Sena. To his followers, indeed to a large number of Marathi youth in Mumbai and Maharashtra, the arrest confers on him the status of a saviour. The more he is seen on the non-Marathi channels and among the Hindi-speaking political classes as a monster, the more he is perceived as a spokesperson by the angry and volatile urban/semi-urban Marathi youth. The law and order establishment in Maharashtra is totally confused as to how to deal with this not-so-sudden rise of an outlaw. Raj likes and adores the Hollywood westerns in which the horse-riding sheriff challenges whole towns of American Indians with his cool, daring and sharpshooting skills. What is a calculated riot for Raj is a "spontaneous rebellion" for his widespread following of lumpen youths. The more they are condemned, the more reckless they become. They are the new cowboys, mainly from the sprawling metropolis of Mumbai.

The rise of Raj can be directly attributed to the total non-performance of the Congress-NCP government as well as to the slow fading of Balasaheb Thackeray. The criminal neglect of Mumbai and other emerging urban centres like Pune, Thane, Nasik, Aurangabad for the past decade or more has raised the level of frustration and anger across the cities. More so among the so-called "local" Marathi populace that has been feeling overwhelmed and marginalised. But the fault is not of those "bhayyas" who are seen as "invaders". The main culprits are the state government and the Shiv Sena-BJP-led corporation which have shown complete disregard for the basic necessities of the city. So it is not as if only the Marathi-speaking people of the city have lost hope. Even the migrants, from all over the country who come to Mumbai and then spread out to other cities, feel despair.

Life is extremely difficult for them and in no way do they compete with the local Marathi youth, who may be unemployed but are not ready to work for 16 hours a day in restaurants, laundries, shops or run taxis and sell bhelpuri and work as unlicensed coolies. They sleep on footpaths, railway stations, under the staircases, in cement pipes brought for massive construction work going on all over the cities. They have very few demands from life except seeing Bollywood films and catching the occasional glimpse of actors. Back home, in some village in UP or Bihar, they are believed to be part of glamorous Mumbai.

Their joys and pleasures are truly melodramatic and are perfectly understood by Bollywood's dream merchants. Once upon a time, the Raj Kapoors and Dilip Kumars cashed in on their dreams, but in those days of Shehar aur Sapna, there used to be sympathy for the migrant poor. But in the new economy, as demand for unskilled, low-wage jobs increased, the so-called sons of the soil could not join their ranks, as they felt it was below their status to work on construction sites or in poor locality restaurants. Hence, in the process, there is a vast new army of the Marathi unemployed urban youth who see in Raj Thackeray a kind of angry hero from the Hindi blockbuster Arjun.

The migration from the Bimaru states to Mumbai and other cities in the state is primarily because there was access to jobs and, with it, liberation from the drudgery and exploitation of village life. This urban poor needed social and even economic protection. Vote-bank politics ensured that the migrants would have their leadership. And so a whole new political class emerged with new networks. The self-styled rural leadership of Maharashtra, actually the moffusil Maratha elite, had no comprehension or concern for the rapidly changing profile of cities like Mumbai. For them the city was vast real estate whose prices were escalating all the time. The deindustrialisation of cities like Mumbai fashionably became known as the rise of the "service industry". The new IT business and the mushrooming of the BPOs as well as the blooming media and entertainment industry were the glamorous ends of the service sector. But the other side of the story was the generation of new jobs at the lower end. The glamorous service sector emerged as cosmopolitan and global islands and the unskilled jobs began to be seen as unofficially reserved for the backward castes and for the migrants of the backward regions.

The Congress and the NCP have totally lost contact with the city dwellers, be they the middle class or the poor. Their disconnect from the traditional base of the marginalised and the poor has grave consequences. The Dalit Marathi youth does not know which part of his identity gives him more benefits - being Dalit or being Marathi. The same is true of the Maratha caste whose elite is in power and the rest have become neo-lumpens. The upper castes and the entrenched middle classes have entered the so-called "knowledge industry" or have been migrating away. The ruling political parties neither understand the changed social dynamic nor do they appear to care. Since the mid-'90s, when the Shiv Sena-BJP combine came to power, there has been a consolidation of a nexus between the mafia, politicians, police and the builders.

The politically orphaned urban mass was looking for a rallying leader. They have found one in Raj Thackeray. By breaking away from the Shiv Sena, he has been able to distance himself from the Sena-BJP rule in the corporation. He is seen as a real-life Arjun who is ready to take on even his cousin, Uddhav, and his old party organisation, the Shiv Sena. If the Congress had concern, compassion and at least comprehension of the malaise, Raj would not have grown. He is occupying a political space virtually donated to him by the ruling alliance. Raj is now a Midnight Cowboy who will acquire more charisma by going to jail and, if not arrested, he will say that the state dare not arrest him. The Congress and the NCP thought they would benefit from the split in the Shiv Sena. Now they have realised that Raj is in fact a challenge to them.
______________________________________
The writer is the editor of 'Loksatta'kumar.ketkar@expressindia.com
allvoices

Saturday, 1 November 2008

Maharashtra and Orissa: Fit Cases for President's Rule

By Amulya Ganguli*                               Muslim India

If there is any justifiability at present in imposing President's rule on a state, it is in Maharashtra and Orissa. But governments at the centre have misused this constitutional provision so often in the past that the present regime lacks the moral authority to take the necessary step.

Yet, there is little doubt that there have been serious failures of governance in both the states. What is more, the lapses are not due to inefficiency or the absence of an adequate number of police personnel, but are the result of nothing other than cynical political calculations.

In Maharashtra, for instance, the targeting of north Indians by the lumpens associated with the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) of Raj Thackeray is just a variation in the kind of parochialism which is the hallmark of such state-based parties. By whipping up sentiments against the "outsider", the MNS wants to build its base of support among the locals.

His uncle, Bal Thackeray, did the same for years with his Shiv Sena venting its ire on south Indians and Muslims and even Gujaratis from the neighbouring state. Raj has chosen a new target to differentiate himself from the Shiv Sena, from which he broke away following a leadership tussle with his cousin, Uddhav, who was favoured by Uddhav's father Bal Thackeray.

Since the present chauvinistic display of the MNS is evidently an attempt to undercut the Shiv Sena's base, the state government under the Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) has not been too energetic in restraining him. Their hope is that the jousting for the Marathi vote between the Shiv Sena and the MNS will damage both to the benefit of the two ruling parties.

Their cynical ploy is also motivated by the fear that harsh action against Raj may alienate a sufficient number of Maharashtrians to undermine the prospects of the Congress and the NCP. It is a reaction typical of unprincipled politicians unsure of their base and willing to adopt any means to retain power.

What they seem to have forgotten, however, is that large sections of non-parochial Maharashtrians, not to mention other residents of the state, will be disillusioned and angered by their disgraceful brand of divisive politics. The rest of India, too, will be shocked by such expediency which cannot but give a bad name to Maharashtrians for the fault of a small group of politicians.

The only solution, therefore, is to impose President's rule. But the Manmohan Singh government is evidently loath to sack a government of the Congress and the NCP, however well-deserved the punishment will be. The dubious tradition of the Congress in this context has always been to dismiss the governments of other parties, or to prevent its rivals from attaining power, as when President's rule was imposed in Bihar in 2005 to prevent the Janata Dal (United)-Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) alliance from coming to power.

Similarly, the government run by the BJP and its allies at the centre refrained from imposing President's rule in Gujarat during the two-month-long communal violence in 2002 since they did not want to antagonize Chief Minister Narendra Modi of the BJP. Clearly, when it comes to partisan conduct, there is little to choose between the Congress and its opponents.

Although there has been communal violence in Orissa in recent weeks, the Manmohan Singh government has only sent paramilitary forces to aid the government when the ruling Biju Janata Dal (BJD) and the BJP should have been shown the door for their failure to save the lives of hapless Christians.

As in Maharashtra, the involvement of fraternal outfits of the BJP such as the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and the Bajrang Dal in the burning of churches and the attacks on isolated villages inhabited by Christians in Orissa ensured that the state government would not be proactive in controlling the situation. Only countrywide condemnation of the outrages forced Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik to take some action and claim that "every bone in my body is secular". But the situation remains tense.

One reason why the Manmohan Singh government might have desisted from dismissing the Patnaik government was that it would then have been asked why it wasn't taking a similar step against the Vilasrao Deshmukh government in Maharashtra.

If the ruling parties in Maharashtra want to exploit the differences between the two Senas for their political advantage, the BJD and the BJP in Orissa do not want to rein in the VHP and the Bajrang Dal because they believe that raising the communal temperature against the Christians will help the two ruling parties to consolidate their Hindu vote bank.

Apart from the Congress's own tarnished record in the matter of imposing President's rule, the Manmohan Singh government is also hamstrung by its own inadequacies in meeting the terrorist threat, which have enabled its opponents to accuse it of appeasing the Muslims. Had it been more determined in tackling this menace, it would have been better placed to show a similar determination in controlling the situation in Maharashtra and Orissa.

But because of its inefficiency and inaction, it gives the impression of being weak and directionless.
______________________________________________
* (Amulya Ganguli is a political analyst. He can be reached at aganguli@gmail.com)
allvoices

Creative Commons